A Phenomenological Explanation of Scientific Field Trips on Effective Learning: A Case Study of Geography Students at Farhangian University, Alborz Province

Document Type : Original Research

Authors

1 Associate Professor, Department of Geography Education, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran

2 Educational officer of Geography Education Department, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Geography Education, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Scientific field trips are associated with generating new knowledge, evaluating and correcting previous ideas, and developing new methods for solving scientific problems. The primary purpose of such trips is to increase knowledge and foster a better understanding of the surrounding world, thereby enhancing insight and transforming thinking. Methods: This research employed a qualitative (phenomenological) approach within the framework of applied research. It aimed to investigate, evaluate, and analyze the scientific field trips undertaken by geography students (enrolled between 2017 and 2022) at Farhangian University in Alborz Province. The research population consisted of 30 field trip reports submitted by the students. For this purpose, a matrix was designed to analyze the feelings, statements, meanings, thematic organization, comprehensive descriptions, and the fundamental and general structure of the field trips within the framework of geographical knowledge, utilizing a phenomenological approach. Findings: Among the 30 submitted reports, the highest frequency of field trip destinations was to the southern (27%) and northern (23%) regions of the country. According to the Colaizzi phenomenological method, the most frequent sense derived from the reports was that of memorization (50%). The compilation of meanings extracted from the reports evoked concepts of leisure and, at times, a superficial approach. The frequency and percentage of formulated meanings, structured into themes by the participants, indicated a reflective formulation of topics. A comprehensive description of the field trips from the participants' perspective highlighted the acquisition and memorization of knowledge. The frequency and percentage of explanations regarding the fundamental structure of the trips focused on concepts. Finally, in monitoring the results from follow-ups with participants, the statistics confirmed the validity of the research findings in line with the Colaizzi phenomenological stages, with 64% of the participants confirming the obtained results. Conclusion: The results of the conducted field trips revealed that the process of effective learning occurred to a very limited extent. Effective learning was observed in only one to three out of the total 30 reports submitted by the students. This indicates an emphasis on the use of prior knowledge—namely, the retrieval and application of previously learned material—rather than the construction of new understanding. For the students, the scientific field trip held more of a recreational aspect. In fact, the reflective formulation of topics was envisioned for them, focusing on acquired concepts. Consequently, the students did not accurately comprehend the world around them, nor did their perspectives change; thus, they failed to develop a correct vision of places, phenomena, trends, events, and the interrelations among them. At the end of the research, suggestions are provided to improve the process of effective learning within the routine of scientific field trips.

Keywords

Main Subjects


حافظ نیا، محمدرضا. (1383). مقدمه‌ای بر روش تحقیق در علوم انسانی، چاپ دهم. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
حبیبی، آرش، و جلال، راحله. (۱۴۰۱). کتاب پدیدارشناسی. تهران: انتشارات نارون.
خاتمی، محمود. (1382). پدیدارشناسی دین: زمینه‌ها. قبسات، 8، 104-93.
خبازی کناری، مهدی، و سبطی، صفا. (1395). «بدنمندی» در پدیدارشناسی هوسرل، مرلوپونتی و لویناس. حکمت و فلسفه، 12(3)، 98-75.
خلیلی مقدم، مریم، سلطانی، مرتضی، یزدانی، حمیدرضا، و خنیفر، حسین. (1397). فهم تجربه خرید احساسی کالای بادوام، مطالعه پدیدارشناختی در خرید لوازم خانگی جهیزیه. فصلنامه مدیریت بازرگانی، 10(2)، 348-325.
دارتیک، آندره. (1373). پدیدارشناسی چیست؟ ترجمه محمود نوالی. تهران: انتشارات سمت.
دیمه ور، محمد، و یوسف روشن، محمدرضا. (1398) ایجاد موقعیت های یادگیری اثربخش در آموزش جغرافیا با استفاده از راهبرد آموزش ترکیبی و گردش علمی. فصلنامه علمی و تخصصی پژوهش در آموزش مطالعات اجتماعی، 1(2)، 95-69.
فتحی واجارگاه، کوروش. (1379). درآمدی بر اردوهای دانش‌آموزی. تهران: انتشارات فاخر.
قرشی میناآباد، محمدباسط، و میرواسع، سیده طیبه. (1390) نقش اردو در غنی سازی اوقات فراغت دانش‌آموزان (مطالعه موردی: دانش‌آموزان دبیرستانی ناحیه 2 رشت). چشم انداز جغرافیایی (مطالعات انسانی)، 6(16)، 114-99.
لطیفی، غلامرضا. (1384). سیمای جهانی اوقات فراغت جوانان. تهران: سازمان ملی جوانان.
منوچهری، سوران. (1396) فعالیت های میدانی جغرافیا و تأثیر آن در پیشرفت تحصیلی. رشد آموزش جغرافیا، 32(2)، 29-22.
نظری، ولی اله، صادقی، علی، و سلیمیان، سعیده. (1400) آموزش پایدار جغرافیا بر پایه بازدیدهای علمی در دانشگاه فرهنگیان نمونه موردی: پردیسهای استان البرز. فصلنامۀ علمی تخصصی پژوهش در آموزش مطالعات اجتماعی، 3(4)، 27-1.
نوالی، محمود. (1380). پدیدار شناسی به‌عنوان شناخت مجدد از شناخت. پژوهشنامه علامه، 1، 237-221.
 
Byrne, M., & Flood, B. (2004). Exploring the conceptions of learning of accounting students. Accounting Education, 13(sup1), 25–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/0963928042000310779
Chang, C. H., Seow, T., Sheng Wu, B., & Irvine, K. (2018). Learning geography beyond the classroom: An investigation of field-based learning in teacher education. Journal of Geography, 117(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2017.1361909
Dartigues, A. (1994). What is phenomenology? (M. Navali, Trans.). SAMT Publications. (Original work published 1973). [In Persian]
Dehmehvar, M., & Yousefi Roshan, M. R. (2019). Creating effective learning situations in geography education using the blended learning strategy and field trips. Journal of Research in Social Studies Education, 1(2), 69-95. [In Persian]
Demirkaya, H., & Atayeter, Y. (2011). A study on the experiences of university lecturers and students in the geography field trip. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 19, 453–461. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.05.151
Fathi Vajargah, K. (2000). An introduction to student field trips. Fakher Publications. [In Persian]
Filippova, V., Savvinova, A., Danilov, Y., Gadal, S., & Kamičaitytė-Virbašienė, J. (2017). The study of cultural landscapes of Central Yakutia for the development of scientific tourism. Journal of Sustainable Architecture and Civil Engineering, 21(4), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.sace.21.4.19777
Gharshi Minaabad, M. B., & Mir Vase, S. T. (2011). The role of field trips in enriching students' leisure time (Case study: High school students in District 2 of Rasht). Geographical Landscape (Human Studies), 6(16), 99-114. [In Persian]
Habibi, A., & Jalal, R. (2022). The book of phenomenology. Naron Publications. [In Persian]
Hafez Nia, M. R. (2004). An introduction to research methods in humanities (10th ed.). SAMT Publications. [In Persian]
Ives-Dewey, D. (2009). Teaching experiential learning in geography: Lessons from planning. Journal of Geography, 107(4-5), 167–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221340802511348
Khabazi Kenari, M., & Sobti, S. (2016). Embodiment in the phenomenology of Husserl, Merleau-Ponty, and Levinas. Hekmat Va Falsafeh (Wisdom and Philosophy), 12(3), 75-98. [In Persian]
Khalili Moghadam, M., Soltani, M., Yazdani, H. R., & Khaneifar, H. (2018). Understanding the experience of emotional durable goods purchasing: A phenomenological study of purchasing dowry home appliances. Business Management Quarterly, 10(2), 325-348. [In Persian]
Khatami, M. (2003). Phenomenology of religion: Contexts. Qabasat, 8, 93-104. [In Persian]
Kocalar, A. O., & Demirkaya, H. (2017). Geography teachers’ views on effective geography teaching. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 7(3), 332–346. http://www.rigeo.org/vol7no3/Number3Winter/RIGEO-V7-N3-5.pdf
Lam, C., & Lai, E. (2003). 'What is geography?' In the eyes of junior secondary students in Hong Kong. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 12(3), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382040308667533
Latifi, G. R. (2005). The global face of youth leisure time. National Youth Organization. [In Persian]
Manouchehri, S. (2017). Geography field activities and their impact on academic progress. Growth of Geography Education, 32(2), 22-29. [In Persian]
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage Publications.
Navali, M. (2001). Phenomenology as a re-cognition of cognition. Allameh Research Journal, 1, 221-237. [In Persian]
Nazari, V. A., Sadeghi, A., & Salimian, S. (2021). Sustainable geography education based on scientific field trips at Farhangian University: Case study of Alborz province campuses. Journal of Research in Social Studies Education, 3(4), 1-27. [In Persian]
Opoku, F., Serbeh, R., & Amoah, E.-G. (2021). Geography education in perspective: An enquiry into Ghanaian senior high school students’ positive and negative attitudes towards geography. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 30(1), 39–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10382046.2020.1727115
Priyono, K. D., Cahyaningrum, A., & Rahmayanti, Y. F. (2022). Strengthening of Geography Teachers MGMP in Salatiga City in learning geography on materials for coastal landscapes through field-work activities at Menganti Beach, Kebumen Regency. In Prosiding Webinar Abdimas 1 (pp. 45–52). Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana.
Sanders, C. (2003). Application of Colaizzi's method: Interpretation of an auditable decision trail by a novice researcher. Contemporary Nurse, 14(3), 292–302. https://doi.org/10.5172/conu.14.3.292
Silviariza, W. Y., Sumarmi, S., & Handoyo, B. (2020). Using Spatial Problem Based Learning (SPBL) model in geography education for developing critical thinking skills. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 8(3), 1045–1060. https://doi.org/10.17478/jegys.737219
Zheng, Q., Zheng, Y., Zheng, Q., & Su, X. (2020). Effects of environmental education and environmental facilities on visitors’ environmental literacy: A case of rural tourism. Revista de Cercetare și Intervenție Socială, 69, 313–323. http://www.rcis.ro/images/documente/rcis69_20.pdf